top of page

Gaslighting Isn’t Just Disagreement: Understanding the Term Before We Misuse It

Gaslighting Isn’t Just Disagreement: Understanding the Term Before We Misuse It

Words hold power , but only if we use them with precision. And few words in today’s mental health discourse have been more misused, diluted, and thrown around casually than “gaslighting.”


On social media, almost any form of conflict is now labeled gaslighting. 

If someone disagrees with your memory? “Gaslighting.” 

If someone challenges your interpretation of an event? “Gaslighting.” 

If someone is simply unkind, rude, or oblivious? Again , “Gaslighting.”


But that’s not what gaslighting actually is. And calling every difficult interaction gaslighting doesn’t just confuse people , it erases the real, long-term psychological harm that survivors of actual gaslighting endure.


Where the Term “Gaslighting” Comes From

The term originated from the 1944 psychological thriller Gaslight, in which a husband manipulates his wife into believing she’s losing her mind. One of his tactics is dimming the gas-powered lights in their home and denying that the lights changed at all when she points it out.


The goal? To destabilize her reality. To make her doubt what she knows she’s perceiving. To convince her that she’s irrational, overly emotional, and mentally unwell , all so he can control, isolate, and disempower her.


From that film came the term “gaslighting” , now used in psychology to describe a pattern of psychological manipulation where one person systematically distorts another person’s sense of reality over time.


What Gaslighting Actually Means (Clinically & Relationally)

Gaslighting is not a one-time disagreement. It is a sustained strategy of emotional control.

Key features include:

  • Consistent invalidation of your memory, perception, or reality

  • Deliberate distortion of facts or past events

  • Blaming you for things you didn’t do or feel

  • Turning others against you to further isolate you

  • Undermining your ability to trust your own judgment


It often sounds like:

  • “That never happened , you always make things up.”

  • “You’re crazy , you’re remembering it wrong.”

  • “You’re too sensitive. No one else would put up with you.”

  • “You’re the problem, not me.”


And over time, the person on the receiving end begins to question their own thoughts, emotions, and identity. They lose confidence. They defer to the gaslighter’s version of events. They become emotionally dependent. And they often don’t realize what’s happening until years later , sometimes only in therapy.


What Gaslighting Is Not

  • It’s not just being lied to. People lie all the time , that’s deception. Gaslighting is a deeper manipulation of your entire sense of reality.

  • It’s not just being disagreed with. Someone having a different opinion or memory of a situation is not inherently gaslighting.

  • It’s not someone being defensive or avoidant. Those can be harmful patterns, but they’re not automatically psychological manipulation.

  • It’s not someone being wrong about how you feel. Misattunement happens. Gaslighting is when someone repeatedly tells you that how you feel is wrong, irrational, or proof that you’re unstable.


The key difference? Intent + repetition + emotional destabilization.


Why Misusing the Word “Gaslighting” Is a Problem

  1. It erodes credibility for real survivors. When everything is gaslighting, nothing is. Survivors of actual gaslighting often question their experience already. Hearing the term overused can make them feel dismissed or misunderstood.

  2. It shuts down conversations. Labeling someone’s discomfort, boundary, or disagreement as “gaslighting” can create false certainty and moral high ground , when the situation might just need better communication.

  3. It replaces emotional regulation with diagnosis. Not all relational tension is trauma. Some of it is miscommunication, mismatch, or immature coping. Using clinical terms to describe normal (if painful) relational experiences can blur the line between harm and incompatibility.


So What Do You Call It When It’s Just... Unkind?

There are plenty of other words that name relational harm more accurately:

  • Dismissive , when someone minimizes or doesn’t make space for your emotions.

  • Invalidating , when someone says “that’s not a big deal” or “you’re being dramatic.”

  • Passive-aggressive , when someone expresses hostility indirectly.

  • Emotionally avoidant , when someone shuts down instead of staying with conflict.

  • Deflecting , when someone changes the subject or shifts blame.


These are real behaviors. They’re frustrating. Sometimes even painful. But they’re not gaslighting unless there is intentional, sustained distortion of your reality over time.


We Don’t Need to Exaggerate Our Pain to Make It Valid

Not every rupture is abuse. 

Not every difficult person is a narcissist. 

Not every argument is gaslighting. 

And not every emotional injury needs a diagnostic label to be taken seriously.


Sometimes, people are just unkind. Or emotionally limited. Or not safe for us to be in connection with. And that is enough of a reason to leave, protect your peace, or redefine the relationship.


You don’t need to call it gaslighting to justify walking away from someone who makes you feel small.


Want more trauma-informed clarity on relational dynamics? Follow Reframing You, where we speak truth without exaggeration, and hold space for pain without mislabeling it.


Reframe You. Reframe Society.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page